Abstract

Objective: With the introduction of Carisolv's newest technologies for caries removal, this Review article updates current information on this conservative chemo-mechanical caries removal method. It is believed that it can reduce the need for anesthesia, maintain tooth structure, minimize the use of rotary instrument, and effectively alleviate anxiety.

Materials and Methods: We'll look at the latest electronic resources: Trials Register of the Cochrane Oral Health Community, Central Register with Clinical Studies, MEDLINE, EMBASE, and PubMed. There would be no limitations on the terms used or the release date. We still intend to search article reference lists and contact experts and associations to see if there are any additional studies.

Criteria for Selection: The following will be considered for inclusion in this study: random control clinical studies, cohort studies, surveys, or case control studies, as well as ADA regulations and guidelines. use of chemo-mechanical method for caries removal. Studies older than 1980, non-blinded clinical trials, and studies documenting the physical and mechanical properties of Carisolv will be exception because these treatments will be tested in different studies.

Data Collection and Analysis: The two authors are expected to conduct their study separately. For every study that satisfies the inclusion and exclusion requirements, two separate authors will determine the likelihood of bias. The review of the literature and conceptual modeling are the key research methods used in this analysis. A first step toward a complete understanding of the Carisolv issue is to identify and classify the causes using a systematic approach. This research would also look at the different forms of Carisolv risks and their features. Dependent on this knowledge, a classification technique to classify these reasons factors for the purpose of identification will be established. In this study, the impact of various types of etiological factors will be extensively analyzed and categorized.

Results: The following are the results of the search: Sixty research papers on the topic were found. Only sixteen research papers are approved after exclusion criteria are applied.

Conclusion: The success or failure of material selection and proper handling is dependent on dental practitioners' knowledge and understanding of Carisolv material compositions, classifications, indications and contraindications, and chemo-mechanical method for caries removal.

Keywords: Carislov; Clinical Recommendations; Guideline; Anti-Cariogenic Agent; Chemo-Mechanical; A Traumatic Technique

References

1. Correa FN., et al. “Chemical versus conventional caries removal techniques in primary teeth: A microhardness study”. Journal of Paediatric Dentistry3 (2007): 187-192.
2. Ericson D. “The efficacy of a new gel for chemo-mechanical caries removal (abstract 360)”. Journal of Dental Research5 (1998): 1252.
3. Chourio MAZ and Zambrano O. “Clinical randomized controlled trial of Chemomechanical caries removal”. International Journal of Paediatric Dentistry 16 (2006): 161-167.
4. Kakaboura A and Masouras C. “A comparative clinical study on the Carisolv caries removal method”. Quintessence International 34 (2003): 269-271.
5. Beeley A., et al. “Chemo-mechanical caries removal: a review of the techniques and latest developments”. British Dental Journal8 (2000): 427-430.
6. Murdoch-Kinch CA and McLean ME. “Minimally invasive dentistry”. Journal of the American Dental Association 134 (2003): 87-95.
7. Kornblit R., et al. “The use of Erbium:YAG laser for caries removal in paediatric patients following minimally invasive dentistry concepts”. European Journal of Paediatric Dentistry 9 (2008): 81-87.
8. Rainey JT. “Air abrasion: an emerging standard of care in conservative operative dentistry”. Dental Clinics of North America 46 (2002): 185-209.
9. Koubi S and Tassery H. “Minimally invasive dentistry using sonic and ultra-sonic devices in ultraconservative Class 2 restorations”. The Journal of Contemporary Dental Practice 9 (2008): 155-165.
10. Maragakis GM., et al. “Chemomechanical caries removal: a comprehensive review of the literature”. International Dental Journal 51 (2001): 291-299.
11. Fusayama T. “Two layers of carious dentin: diagnosis and treatment”. Operative Dentistry 4 (1979): 63-70.
12. Albrektsson T. “Tissue preservation in caries treatment”. London: Quintessence (2001): 118-120.
13. Goldberg M and Keil B. “Action of a bacterial Achromobacter collagenase on the soft carious dentine: an in vitro study with the scanning electron microscope”. Journal de Biologie Buccale 17 (1989): 269-274.
14. Beltz RE., et al. “Pronase digestion of carious dentin”. Caries Research 33 (1999): 468-472.
15. Goldman M and Kronman JH. “A preliminary report on a chemomechanical means of removing caries”. Journal of the American Dental Association 93 (1976): 1149-1153.
16. Nadanovsky P., et al. “Removal of caries using only hand instruments: A comparison of mechanical and chemo-mechanical methods”. Caries Research 35 (2001): 384-389.
17. Fusayama T. “Two layers of carious dentin: Diagnosis and treatment”. Operative Dentistry 4 (1979): 63-70.
18. Beeley JA., et al. “Chemomechanical caries removal: a review of techniques and latest developments”. The British Dental Journal 188 (2000): 427-430.
19. Pai S V., et al. “Chemical analysis of dentin surfaces after Carisolv Treatment”. Journal of Conservative Dentistry 3 (2009): 118-122.
20. Kavvadia K., et al. “Primary teeth caries removal using the Carisolv chemomechanical method: a clinical trial”. Pediatric Dentistry1 (2004): 23-28.
21. Banerjee A., et al. “Scanning electron microscope observations of human dentin after mechanical caries excavation”. Dentistry 28 (2000): 179-186.
22. Montedori A., et al. “Lasers for caries removal in deciduous and permanent teeth (Protocol)”. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 11 (2012): CD010229.
23. Marquezan M., et al. “Evaluation of the methodologies used in clinical trials and effectiveness of chemo-mechanical caries removal with CarisolvTM”. Brazilian Oral Research 20 (2006): 364-371.
24. Matsumoto K., et al. “Clinical dental application of ER: YAG laser for Class V cavity preparation”. Journal of Clinical Laser Medicine and Surgery 14 (1996): 123-127.
25. Horiguchi S., et al. “Selective caries removal with air abrasion”. Operative Dentistry 23 (1998): 236-243.
26. Frenken JE., et al. “Atraumatic restorative treatment (ART): Rationale, technique, and development”. Journal of Public Health Dentistry 56 (1996): 135-140.
27. Habib CM., et al. “A chemical evaluation of collagen and hydroxyproline after treatment with GK-101 (N-Monochloroglycine)”. Pharmacology and Therapeutics for Dentistry 2 (1975): 209-215.
28. Maragakis G., et al. “Chemomechanical caries removal: A comprehensive review of the literature”. International Dental Journal 51 (2001): 291-299.
29. Igarashi I., et al. “Softening of carious dentin by Carisolv gel”. Japanese Journal of Conservative Dentistry 41 (1998): 704-707.