Review Article
Volume 14 Issue 7 - 2022
The Presence of fMRI in European and American Courts
Konstantina Kotsaki1,2,3*
1Psychologist, Greece
2MSc, University of Central Lancashire, United Kingdom
3Training in Forensic, Investigative and Criminal Psychology, Greece
4Session Chair, Speaker, Organizing Committee Member, and Moderator at a Great Variety of Intenational Webinars/Conferences
*Corresponding Author: Konstantina Kotsaki, Forensic, Investigative and Criminal Psychologist, Greece.
Received: June 21, 2022; Published: July 28, 2022




Abstract

The permanent scope of courts has been to detect the truth and the lie, because they comprise the hallmark of justice. The last more reliable lie-detection tool before fMRI was the polygraph. fMRI was proved to be a more reliable tool, compared to a polygraph, to evaluate the claims of somebody as true or deceptive. Yet, it could detect false memory and if this memory leads to a lie or is restored. Its accuracy and reliability were proved through abundant scientific studies, and the scientific community has approved fMRI as a reliable lie-detection machine. Furthermore, fMRI could evaluate the psychopathic level of someone. The prejudices that the fMRI recordings were just images could not stand up. Either the countermeasures could not jolt the fMRI accuracy.

Since the beginning, neither the fact that its feedback did not cover all the American Supreme Court parameters to be accepted as court evidence nor the fear that the justice representatives might misinterpret the neuroscientific terms could impede the acceptance and impact of fMRI as legal evidence. Its use was extended to many criminal cases in European states. The fMRI influence was proved to be of vital importance. There are serious allegations that fMRI should be a coercive examination.

Keywords: fMRI; Lie-Detection; Forensic; Law; Brain; Polygraph; Human Rights; Recidivism

References

  1. Cooper E. “Lie Detection: A Changing of The Guard In The Quest For Truth In Court?” Law and Psychology Review 33 (2009): 139-149.
  2. Marks HD. “Interrogation Using Functional Mri And Cognitive Engrams”. Journal of the Institute of Justice and International Studies 8 (2008): 31-37.
  3. Kleinmuntz B and Szucko JJ. “Lie detection in ancient and modern times: A call for contemporary scientific study”. American Psychologist7 (1984): 766-776.
  4. Meijer HE and Verschuere B. “Deception detection based on neuroimaging: Better than the polygraph?” Journal of Forensic Radiology and Imaging (2017).
  5. Iacono GW and Lykken TD. “The Validity of the Lie Detector: Two Surveys of Scientific Opinion”. Journal of Applied Psychology3 (1997): 428-430.
  6. Kozel FA., et al. “Detecting Deception Using Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging”. BIPSY 58 (2005): 605-613.
  7. Marchewka A., et al. “Sex, Lies and FMRI - Gender Differences in Neural Basis of Deception”. Plos One (2012).
  8. Haynes J-D. “Brain Reading”. In: Richmond S, Rees G, Edwards S, editors. I Know What You’re Thinking: Brain Imaging And Mental Privacy”. Oxford: Oxford University Press (2012): 29-40.
  9. Feigenson N. “Brain Imaging and Courtroom Evidence: On the Admissibility and Persuasiveness of fMRI”. In: McLean S, Freeman M, Goodenough RO, editors”. Law, Mind and Brain. London: Routledge; (2017): 23-54.
  10. Ogawa S., et al. “Brain magnetic resonance imaging with contrast dependent on blood oxygenation”. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 87 (1990): 9868-9872.
  11. McCabe PD., et al. “The influence of fMRI lie detection evidence on juror decision-making”. Behavioral Sciences and the Law 29 (2011): 566-577.
  12. Myers B., et al. “The court of public opinion: Lay perceptions of polygraph testing”. Law and Human Behavior 30 (2006): 509-523.
  13. Davatzikos C., et al. “Classifying spatial patterns of brain activity with machine learning methods: Application to lie detection”. Neuroimage 28 (2005): 663-668.
  14. Langleben DD., et al. “Telling truth from lie in individual subjects with fast event-related fMRI”. Human Brain Mapping4 (2005): 262-272.
  15. Simpson JR. “Functional MRI lie detection: too good to be true?” Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law4 (2008): 491-498.
  16. Wagner A. “Can neuroscience identify lies?” In: Gazzaniga SM, Rakoff JS, editors. A Judge's Guide to Neuroscience: A Concise Introduction. California: University of California, Santa Barbara (2010): 13-25.
  17. Mandell A. “Chair, Committee On Science And Law. Are your thoughts your own? “Neuroprivacy” and the legal implications of brain imaging (2005).
  18. Thompson SK. “The legality of the use of psychiatric neuroimaging in intelligence interrogation”. Corn Law Review 90 (2005): 1601-1638.
  19. Faigman LD., et al. “Neuroscientists in Court”. Nature Reviews Neuroscience 4 (2013): 73-735.
  20. Rosen RB and Savoy LR. “FMRI at 20: Has it changed the world?” NeuroIogy (2012).
  21. Moberg PJ and Kniele K. “Evaluation of competency: Ethical considerations for neuropsychologists”. Applied Neuropsychology2 (2006): 101-114.
  22. Rosen AC and Gur RC. “Ethical considerations for neuropsychologists as functional magnetic imagers”. Brain and Cognition 3 (2002): 469-481.
  23. The United States Court of Appeals. Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharms., Inc., 509 U (1993): 579 597.
  24. Meegan VD. “Neuroimaging Techniques for Memory Detection: Scientific, Ethical, and Legal Issues”. The American Journal of Bioethics 8 (2008): 9-20.
  25. Schweitzer JN and Saks JM. “Neuroimage Evidence and the Insanity Defense”. Behavioral Sciences and the Law 29 (2011): 592-607.
  26. Schweitzer NJ Saks MJ., et al. “Neuroimages as evidence in a mens rea defense: no impact”. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law3 (2011): 357-393.
  27. Weisberg DS. “The seductive allure of neuroscience explanations”. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 20 (2008): 470-477.
  28. Miller G. fMRI Evidence Used in Murder Sentencing (2009).
  29. Cohen J and Meskin A. “On the Epistemic Value of Photographs”. The Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 62 (2004): 197-210.
  30. Cohen J and Meskin A. “Photographs as Evidence”. In: Walden S, editor. Photography and Philosophy. New York: Blackwell (2008): 70-90.
  31. Walton LK. “Transparent Pictures: On the Nature of Photographic Realism”. Critical Inquiry 11 (1984): 246-276.
  32. Kotsaki K., et al. “Ugo Cerletti (1877-1963): an early Italian father of electroshock and a pioneer in many other ways”. Neuroscience (2021).
  33. Brown T and Murphy E. “Through a Scanner Darkly: Functional Neuroimaging as Evidence of a Criminal Defendant’s Past Mental States”. The Stanford Law Review4 (2010): 1119-1208.
  34. Compton SE. “Not guilty by reason of neuroimaging: the need for cautionary jury instructions for neuroscience evidence in criminal trials”. The Vanderbilt Journal of Entertainment and Technology Law 12 (2010): 333-354.
  35. Faigman LD., et al. “Check your crystal ball at the courthouse door, please: Exploring the past, understanding the present, and worrying about the future of scientific evidence”. The Clinical Law Review 15 (1994): 1799-1810.
  36. Greely TH and Illes J. “Neuroscience-Based Lie Detection: The Urgent Need for Regulation”. The American Journal of Law and Medicine2-3 (2007): 377-431.
  37. Honess MT and Charman AE. “Members of the jury - Guilty or incompetence?” The Psych.2 (2002): 72-75.
  38. McAuliff DB., et al. “Juror decision-making in the Twenty-First Century: Confronting science and technology in court”. In: Carson D, Bull R, editors. Handbook of psychology in legal contexts”. West Sussex, England: John Wiley and Sons Ltd (2003): 303-329.
  39. Pratt B. “‘Soft’ science in the courtroom?: The effects of admitting neuroimaging evidence into legal proceedings”. Penn Bioethics Journal 1 (2005): 1-3.
  40. Sinnott-Armstrong W., et al. “Brain Imaging as Legal Evidence”. EPIST 5 (2008): 359-373.
  41. Vincent NA. “Neuroimaging and responsibility assessments”. Neurone 4 (2011): 35-49.
  42. Wolpe PR., et al. “Emerging neurotechnologies for lie detection: Promises and perils”. American Journal of Bioethics2 (2005): 39-49.
  43. Kaplan MF and Miller LE. “Reducing the effects of juror bias”. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 36 (1978): 1443-1455.
  44. Kerwin J and Shaffer DR. “Mock jurors versus mock juries: The role of deliberations in reactions to inadmissible testimony”. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin - SAGE Journals 20 (1994): 153-162.
  45. Hakun GJ., et al. “fMRI investigation of the cognitive structure of the Concealed Information Test”. Neur (2008).
  46. Meek WS., et al. “The Impact of Memory Retrieval on Deception and Truth Telling”. N A J Psychology 3 (2018): 637-652.
  47. Shao R and Lee TMC. “Are individuals with higher psychopathic traits better learners at lying? Behavioural and neural evidence”. Translational Psychiatry (2017).
  48. Yu J., et al. “Can fMRI discriminate between deception and false memory? A meta-analytic comparison between deception and false memory studies”. Neurosc Biob Review 104 (2019): 43-55.
  49. Farisco M and Petrini, C. “On the Stand. Another Episode of Neuroscience and Law Discussion From Italy”. Neuroe (2013).
  50. Ligthart JTLS. “Coercive neuroimaging, criminal law, and privacy: a European perspective”. Journal of Law and the Biosciences (2019).
  51. Gurley JR and Marcus DK. “The effects of neuroimaging and brain injury on insanity defences”. Behavioral Sciences and the Law 26 (2008): 85-97.
  52. Lieberman JD., et al. “Gold versus platinum: Do jurors recognize the superiority and limitations of DNA evidence compared to other types of forensic evidence?” Psychology, Public Policy, and Law1 (2008): 27-62.
  53. Muncy MN and Kirwan CB. “Correcting False Memories: The Effect of Mnemonic Generalization on Original Memory Traces”. BioR (2021).
  54. Langleben DD., et al. “Imaging deception with fMRI: The effects of salience and ecological relevance”. 34th Annual Meeting of the Society for Neuroscience, San Diego, CA, Society for Neuroscience, Washington, DC (2004).
  55. Hsu C-W., et al. “The effect of mental countermeasures on neuroimaging-based concealed information tests”. Human Brain Mapping (2019).
  56. Ganis G., et al. “Lying in the Scanner: Covert Countermeasures Disrupt Deception Detection by Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging”. Neurology 55 (2011): 312-319.
  57. (GC). Ibrahim and others/UK, appl.nos. 50,541/08, 50,571/08, 50,573/08, 40,351/09, § 267 (2016).
  58. (GC). Ibrahim and others/UK, appl.nos. 50,541/08, 50,571/08, 50,573/08, 40,351/09, § 266 (2016).
  59. Funke v. France, appl.no. 10828/84 (1993).
  60. J.B. v. Switzerland 31827/96, appl.no. 31827/96 (2001).
  61. Caruana v. Malta, appl.no. 41079/16, § 36 (2018).
  62. (GC). Saunders v. UK, appl.no. 19187/91, § 69 (1996).
  63. Funke v. France, appl.no. 10828/84, § 44 (1993).
  64. Ganci v. Italy, appl.no. 41576/98, § 20–22 (2003).
  65. (GC). Boulois v. Luxembourg, appl.no. 37575/04, § 85 (2012).
  66. Wanner v. Germany, appl.no. 26892/12 (2018).
  67. Jackson JD and Summers JS. “The Internationalisation of Criminal Evidence: Beyond the Common Law and Civil Law Traditions. 1st edition”. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press (2012).
  68. United States Supreme Court. Gilbert v. California, 388 U.S. 263, 267 (1967).
  69. (GC). Bărbulescu v. Romania, appl.no. 61496/08, § 70 (2017).
  70. Aycaguer v. France, appl.no. 8806/12, § 33 (2017).
  71. (GC). S. and Marper v. UK, appl.nos. 30,562/04, 30,566/04, §72, 75, 84 (2008).
  72. (GC). S. and Marper v. UK, appl.nos. 30,562/04, 30,566/04, §74 – 76, 120 (2008).
  73. Peruzzo and Martens v. Germany, appl.nos. 7841/08,57,900/12, § 44–49 (2013).
  74. Schmidt v. Germany, appl.no. 2352/02 (2006).
  75. W. v. The Netherlands, appl.no. 20689/08, 9 (2009).
  76. ECtHR (GC). S. and Marper v. UK, appl.nos. 30,562/04, 30,566/04, § 72–73 (2008).
  77. Kocsis NR. “Criminal profiling: principles and practice”. New Jersey: Humana Press (2006).
  78. Murdoch J. “Protecting the right to freedom of thought, conscience and religion under the European convention on human rights”. Strasbourg: Council of Europe (2012).
  79. Simpson JR. “Neuroimaging in forensic psychiatry: From the clinic to the courtroom”. 1st Chichester, West Susssex: Wiley-Blackwell (2012).
  80. Court of Appeals of Maryland. Colvin-e1 v. State, 332 Md. 144, 166, 630 A.2d 725, 736 (1993).
  81. Maryland’s supreme court, The Court of Appeals. Garnett v. State, 332 Md. 571, 576-79,632 A.2d 797, 800-01 (1993).
  82. Kotsaki K. “A Historical Review on Stigma of Epilepsy and its Interactive Factors”. Global Journal of Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities5 (2022): 001-0010.
Citation: Konstantina Kotsaki. “The Presence of fMRI in European and American Courts”. EC Neurology 14.8 (2022): 24-37.

PubMed Indexed Article


EC Pharmacology and Toxicology
LC-UV-MS and MS/MS Characterize Glutathione Reactivity with Different Isomers (2,2' and 2,4' vs. 4,4') of Methylene Diphenyl-Diisocyanate.

PMID: 31143884 [PubMed]

PMCID: PMC6536005


EC Pharmacology and Toxicology
Alzheimer's Pathogenesis, Metal-Mediated Redox Stress, and Potential Nanotheranostics.

PMID: 31565701 [PubMed]

PMCID: PMC6764777


EC Neurology
Differences in Rate of Cognitive Decline and Caregiver Burden between Alzheimer's Disease and Vascular Dementia: a Retrospective Study.

PMID: 27747317 [PubMed]

PMCID: PMC5065347


EC Pharmacology and Toxicology
Will Blockchain Technology Transform Healthcare and Biomedical Sciences?

PMID: 31460519 [PubMed]

PMCID: PMC6711478


EC Pharmacology and Toxicology
Is it a Prime Time for AI-powered Virtual Drug Screening?

PMID: 30215059 [PubMed]

PMCID: PMC6133253


EC Psychology and Psychiatry
Analysis of Evidence for the Combination of Pro-dopamine Regulator (KB220PAM) and Naltrexone to Prevent Opioid Use Disorder Relapse.

PMID: 30417173 [PubMed]

PMCID: PMC6226033


EC Anaesthesia
Arrest Under Anesthesia - What was the Culprit? A Case Report.

PMID: 30264037 [PubMed]

PMCID: PMC6155992


EC Orthopaedics
Distraction Implantation. A New Technique in Total Joint Arthroplasty and Direct Skeletal Attachment.

PMID: 30198026 [PubMed]

PMCID: PMC6124505


EC Pulmonology and Respiratory Medicine
Prevalence and factors associated with self-reported chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults aged 40-79: the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) 2007-2012.

PMID: 30294723 [PubMed]

PMCID: PMC6169793


EC Dental Science
Important Dental Fiber-Reinforced Composite Molding Compound Breakthroughs

PMID: 29285526 [PubMed]

PMCID: PMC5743211


EC Microbiology
Prevalence of Intestinal Parasites Among HIV Infected and HIV Uninfected Patients Treated at the 1o De Maio Health Centre in Maputo, Mozambique

PMID: 29911204 [PubMed]

PMCID: PMC5999047


EC Microbiology
Macrophages and the Viral Dissemination Super Highway

PMID: 26949751 [PubMed]

PMCID: PMC4774560


EC Microbiology
The Microbiome, Antibiotics, and Health of the Pediatric Population.

PMID: 27390782 [PubMed]

PMCID: PMC4933318


EC Microbiology
Reactive Oxygen Species in HIV Infection

PMID: 28580453 [PubMed]

PMCID: PMC5450819


EC Microbiology
A Review of the CD4 T Cell Contribution to Lung Infection, Inflammation and Repair with a Focus on Wheeze and Asthma in the Pediatric Population

PMID: 26280024 [PubMed]

PMCID: PMC4533840


EC Neurology
Identifying Key Symptoms Differentiating Myalgic Encephalomyelitis and Chronic Fatigue Syndrome from Multiple Sclerosis

PMID: 28066845 [PubMed]

PMCID: PMC5214344


EC Pharmacology and Toxicology
Paradigm Shift is the Normal State of Pharmacology

PMID: 28936490 [PubMed]

PMCID: PMC5604476


EC Neurology
Examining those Meeting IOM Criteria Versus IOM Plus Fibromyalgia

PMID: 28713879 [PubMed]

PMCID: PMC5510658


EC Neurology
Unilateral Frontosphenoid Craniosynostosis: Case Report and a Review of the Literature

PMID: 28133641 [PubMed]

PMCID: PMC5267489


EC Ophthalmology
OCT-Angiography for Non-Invasive Monitoring of Neuronal and Vascular Structure in Mouse Retina: Implication for Characterization of Retinal Neurovascular Coupling

PMID: 29333536 [PubMed]

PMCID: PMC5766278


EC Neurology
Longer Duration of Downslope Treadmill Walking Induces Depression of H-Reflexes Measured during Standing and Walking.

PMID: 31032493 [PubMed]

PMCID: PMC6483108


EC Microbiology
Onchocerciasis in Mozambique: An Unknown Condition for Health Professionals.

PMID: 30957099 [PubMed]

PMCID: PMC6448571


EC Nutrition
Food Insecurity among Households with and without Podoconiosis in East and West Gojjam, Ethiopia.

PMID: 30101228 [PubMed]

PMCID: PMC6086333


EC Ophthalmology
REVIEW. +2 to +3 D. Reading Glasses to Prevent Myopia.

PMID: 31080964 [PubMed]

PMCID: PMC6508883


EC Gynaecology
Biomechanical Mapping of the Female Pelvic Floor: Uterine Prolapse Versus Normal Conditions.

PMID: 31093608 [PubMed]

PMCID: PMC6513001


EC Dental Science
Fiber-Reinforced Composites: A Breakthrough in Practical Clinical Applications with Advanced Wear Resistance for Dental Materials.

PMID: 31552397 [PubMed]

PMCID: PMC6758937


EC Microbiology
Neurocysticercosis in Child Bearing Women: An Overlooked Condition in Mozambique and a Potentially Missed Diagnosis in Women Presenting with Eclampsia.

PMID: 31681909 [PubMed]

PMCID: PMC6824723


EC Microbiology
Molecular Detection of Leptospira spp. in Rodents Trapped in the Mozambique Island City, Nampula Province, Mozambique.

PMID: 31681910 [PubMed]

PMCID: PMC6824726


EC Neurology
Endoplasmic Reticulum-Mitochondrial Cross-Talk in Neurodegenerative and Eye Diseases.

PMID: 31528859 [PubMed]

PMCID: PMC6746603


EC Psychology and Psychiatry
Can Chronic Consumption of Caffeine by Increasing D2/D3 Receptors Offer Benefit to Carriers of the DRD2 A1 Allele in Cocaine Abuse?

PMID: 31276119 [PubMed]

PMCID: PMC6604646


EC Anaesthesia
Real Time Locating Systems and sustainability of Perioperative Efficiency of Anesthesiologists.

PMID: 31406965 [PubMed]

PMCID: PMC6690616


EC Pharmacology and Toxicology
A Pilot STEM Curriculum Designed to Teach High School Students Concepts in Biochemical Engineering and Pharmacology.

PMID: 31517314 [PubMed]

PMCID: PMC6741290


EC Pharmacology and Toxicology
Toxic Mechanisms Underlying Motor Activity Changes Induced by a Mixture of Lead, Arsenic and Manganese.

PMID: 31633124 [PubMed]

PMCID: PMC6800226


EC Neurology
Research Volunteers' Attitudes Toward Chronic Fatigue Syndrome and Myalgic Encephalomyelitis.

PMID: 29662969 [PubMed]

PMCID: PMC5898812


EC Pharmacology and Toxicology
Hyperbaric Oxygen Therapy for Alzheimer's Disease.

PMID: 30215058 [PubMed]

PMCID: PMC6133268


News and Events


December Issue Release

We always feel pleasure to share our updates with you all. Here, notifying you that we have successfully released the November issue of respective journals and the latest articles can be viewed on the current issue pages.

Submission Deadline for Upcoming Issue

ECronicon delightfully welcomes all the authors around the globe for effective collaboration with an article submission for the upcoming issue of respective journals. Submissions are accepted on/before December 20, 2022.

Certificate of Publication

ECronicon honors with a "Publication Certificate" to the corresponding author by including the names of co-authors as a token of appreciation for publishing the work with our respective journals.

Best Article of the Issue

Editors of respective journals will always be very much interested in electing one Best Article after each issue release. The authors of the selected article will be honored with a "Best Article of the Issue" certificate.

Certifying for Review

ECronicon certifies the Editors for their first review done towards the assigned article of the respective journals.

Latest Articles

The latest articles will be updated immediately on the articles in press page of the respective journals.